Chaos as Economic Warfare

by Kevin D. Freeman on November 28, 2016

uw-book-coverAccording to the book, Unrestricted Warfare, the end goal of economic warfare is chaos. It is accomplished through social panic, street riots and a political crisis after confidence is destroyed in the banking system, media, stock market, and power grid.

This is how you defeat a superior enemy without firing a shot:

“However, by using the combination method, a completely different scenario and game can occur: if the attacking side secretly (or quietly) musters large amounts of capital without the enemy nation being aware of this at all and launches a sneak attack against its financial markets, then after causing a financial crisis, buries a computer virus and hacker detachment in the opponent’s computer system in advance, while at the same time carrying out a network attack against the enemy so that the civilian electricity network, traffic dispatching network, financial transaction network, telephone communications network, and mass media network are completely paralyzed, this will cause the enemy nation to fall into social panic, street riots, and a political crisis.”

We’ve already seen riots over the election results. Many believe that George Soros is funding the protests that have led to the riots. Now, we are hearing rumors that George Soros may be secretly funding the recount effort initiated by Jill Stein. While there is no proof that any ballots were miscounted, there are admittedly unsubstantiated charges that hacking may have taken place and possibly tipped the election to Donald Trump. Even though the smallest state margin of victory is far greater than any recount has ever shifted, Jill Stein is intent on pressing forward. The Clinton campaign has joined Stein’s effort despite the fact that all three states would need to be switched from Trump to give her the electoral votes required.

George_Soros_-_Festival_Economia_2012_01

Yes, there is a great deal of irony in the fact that Clinton demanded Donald Trump accept the election results. Yes, Secretary Clinton has already conceded defeat. Apparently, there was some agreement in place that the loser would concede within 15 minutes of the call by the Associated Press. And yes, Clinton supporters were quick to claim that if Mr. Trump lost, there would be riots.

Regardless, the fact is that Mr. Trump won on election night and it was Clinton supporters who were rioting, possibly instigated to that purpose. Don’t forget that undercover video did expose that the unrest Mr. Trump experienced in Chicago during the primaries was manufactured by Democrat operatives. People were paid to riot.

trump_protest_chicago_march_11_2016All of this is a type of Unrestricted Warfare to weaken a nation. Mr. Soros is mentioned by name in the book Unrestricted Warfare and likened to a financial terrorist. He was also convicted of insider trading in France. And he has been predicting social unrest in America for years.

There is already an effort to sway electors for the Electoral College to go against their pledge and elect Clinton over Trump. Some are being begged while others are receiving death threats. Who is funding that effort?

By the way, if an election is subject to hacking, is a recount also vulnerable? Are there precautions in place?

America is already on edge, in part because half the electorate is disappointed. But we also have today’s mass stabbing at Ohio State by a Somali refugee.

Now, just imagine for a moment the chaos that would be unleashed if the election results were mysteriously overturned by a recount taking place in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. It would be Civil War, perhaps even leading to the imposition of Martial Law. Would that be the intention?

One thing is clear. The raw ingredients are in place for an Unrestricted Warfare attack on the United States. And the time between the election and the Inauguration is considered ideal for such an attack. [By the way, let me use this opportunity to again plug the novel, Election: Unrestricted Warfare, written by my good friend Chris Graham. I’m using his book cover photo for this blog because the title fits so well.]

Keep in  mind that it is highly unlikely, actually virtually impossible, for a fair recount to change the election results. There would have to be (or have been) serious manipulation at work. We do not expect anything to change. Donald Trump should be inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States on January 20, 2017. But we should remain ever vigilant and remain in prayer. This is no time to let our guard down. There’s too much at stake and too many people who would prefer to see America fall.

Previous post:

Next post: